Tenant Protections or Tenant Rejections? The PRS Under Pressure
The Renters’ Rights Bill, aimed at overhauling the private rental market in England and Wales, promises sweeping reforms intended to balance tenant protections with landlord responsibilities.
While the Bill champions a more equitable relationship between renters and property owners, its unintended consequences have drawn scrutiny—particularly regarding its potential to exclude vulnerable tenants from the private rented sector (PRS).
This article delves into how the proposed legislation, despite its tenant-centric vision, may inadvertently discourage landlords from letting low-income tenants, those receiving benefits, and individuals with limited references or poor credit history.
The very reforms designed to make renting fairer could restrict access to housing for the very people they aim to protect.
What is the Renters’ Rights Bill?
The Renters’ Rights Bill represents a significant shift in housing policy, largely inspired by the government’s long-promised reforms to empower tenants and rebalance the rental market. Core components of the Bill include:
- Abolition of “no-fault” evictions under Section 21.
- Introduction of a single system of periodic tenancies.
- Stricter grounds for possession under Section 8.
- Increased powers for councils to enforce standards.
- Mandatory landlord registration and property portal.
- Stricter requirements for rent increases.
- Limits on blanket bans against tenants on benefits or with children.
While these provisions may enhance security and clarity for tenants, they also introduce complexities for landlords, especially small private landlords who dominate the UK PRS.
The PRS Landscape and Tenant Vulnerability
The private rented sector plays a critical role in housing millions of people across the UK, including families, students, and pensioners.
Vulnerable tenants—those who rely on welfare support, have limited income or possess minimal rental history—depend heavily on access to affordable and flexible rental housing.
Yet, this segment of the tenant population is often perceived as ‘higher risk’ by landlords. Before the Bill, landlords could legally exercise discretion in tenant selection, including declining tenants who lacked robust references, had adverse credit histories, or were in receipt of housing benefits.
The Renters’ Rights Bill seeks to eliminate blanket discrimination, but this may only shift such decisions behind closed doors rather than ending them entirely.
Why Landlords Might Become More Risk-Averse
With the end of Section 21 and the expansion of tenant rights, landlords will face increased difficulty in regaining possession of their properties.
Legal evictions will rely on specific grounds under Section 8, many of which are difficult to prove or time-consuming to enforce. This added friction is expected to change landlord behaviour in several ways:
Tighter Screening Practices
Landlords, unable to easily evict a tenant who falls into arrears or causes problems, may double down on initial screening. This includes requiring higher income thresholds, longer employment history, or impeccable references—all of which disproportionately affect vulnerable tenants.
Preference for Higher-Earning Tenants
Without the ability to recover possession quickly, landlords may prefer to rent to tenants who are deemed financially secure. As a result, low-income renters and those on Universal Credit may face increased rejection.
Exit from the Market
A proportion of landlords may opt to exit the PRS altogether, selling up due to tighter regulations, reduced flexibility, and the threat of fines. This would minimise available stock, increasing competition and rents, further marginalising vulnerable renters.
Rent Increases
Landlords facing tighter margins or additional compliance costs may push up rents to offset perceived risks. This leaves those on fixed or low incomes unable to compete for housing.
The Unintended Lockout Effect
The Renters’ Rights Bill intends to end arbitrary discrimination and provide secure housing, but it may paradoxically deepen exclusion for specific groups. Vulnerable tenants could be locked out due to:
- Soft Discrimination: Even with legal safeguards, landlords might use subjective criteria to reject applicants, such as referencing ambiguities or perceived ‘unsuitable behaviour.’
- Higher Deposits and Guarantors: Some landlords may demand additional deposits or require a guarantor for tenants they see as high risk. Many vulnerable tenants are unable to meet these demands.
- Greater Reliance on Letting Agents: Larger, regulated agencies may implement rigid application systems that indirectly exclude non-standard tenants.
- Reduced Supply of Affordable Rentals: A decrease in the availability of housing units, often due to landlord withdrawal, disproportionately affects tenants with limited housing choices.
Case Example: A Single Parent on Universal Credit
Consider a single mother of two receiving housing support via Universal Credit. Under the Bill, she cannot be directly refused a tenancy on the grounds of benefit status. However, a landlord might still:
- Reject her application based on ‘insufficient income’ when applying arbitrary affordability ratios.
- Request references from previous landlords and employers, which she may not have.
- Demand a guarantor with a certain income level—effectively barring her from the tenancy.
The legal mechanism may have changed, but the net result is the same: exclusion.
Policy Intent vs Practical Outcomes
The Renters’ Rights Bill reflects a genuine effort to reform a historically imbalanced sector. However, the gap between policy intention and street-level implementation could widen without supporting measures. Current shortcomings include:
- Lack of Landlord Incentives: There are no government-backed incentives (such as rent guarantee schemes or risk pooling funds) to encourage landlords to let higher-risk tenants.
- Weak Enforcement Mechanisms: While the Bill bans blanket exclusions, enforcement largely relies on the tenant lodging a complaint or seeking redress—something many vulnerable renters may not feel empowered to do.
- No Meaningful Data Transparency: Without publicly accessible data on tenant acceptance rates, the government may struggle to identify if discrimination is persisting covertly.
What Could Be Done to Prevent Lockout?
To ensure the Bill does not lock out those it intends to protect, the following supportive reforms and strategies could be introduced:
Deposit Replacement and Insurance Schemes
Encouraging the use of deposit insurance schemes would reduce upfront costs and risk burdens for landlords.
Government-Backed Guarantor Programs
A state-supported guarantor initiative could help tenants without family or corporate guarantors gain access to private rentals.
Targeted Landlord Tax Incentives
Offering tax reliefs or subsidies to landlords housing low-income tenants or those on Universal Credit would make such arrangements financially viable.
More Social and Council Housing
Ultimately, easing the burden on the PRS requires a long-term commitment to increasing the availability of genuinely affordable housing alternatives.
Tenant Support and Education
Equipping vulnerable tenants with more straightforward advice, template complaint forms, and information on their rights would enhance their confidence and reduce their dependency on landlords’ goodwill alone.
Broader Impacts on Local Authorities and Housing Charities
Local councils and housing support organisations are likely to face mounting pressure if vulnerable renters are sidelined from the PRS.
With fewer options, more individuals may present as homeless or require temporary accommodation. This increases strain on already overburdened public resources.
Charities such as Shelter and Crisis have already expressed concerns that the removal of ‘no fault’ evictions must be coupled with landlord education, legal support, and housing affordability strategies to be effective.
Summary
While the Renters’ Rights Bill marks a decisive step toward improving tenant security, it risks sidelining the very populations it was designed to protect.
Vulnerable renters may find themselves increasingly unable to access homes in the PRS due to landlords’ heightened caution, economic risk aversion, and the unintended consequences of more rigid letting standards.
The solution is not to scale back tenant protections, but to embed those reforms within a broader strategy that includes incentives for landlords, enhanced tenant support, increased social housing, and proactive enforcement mechanisms.
Unless these support pillars are implemented simultaneously, the rental market could become even more exclusionary despite the rhetoric of fairness and reform.
FAQs
What is the main aim of the Renters’ Rights Bill?
The Bill aims to enhance security, fairness, and standards in the private rented sector by prohibiting no-fault evictions, introducing a single periodic tenancy model, regulating rent increases, and strengthening enforcement against rogue landlords.
Why might the bill lockout vulnerable tenants?
By removing Section 21 and increasing landlords’ risk of being “stuck” with a problematic tenant, many landlords may adopt stricter screening measures that inadvertently disadvantage low-income or vulnerable applicants.
Who are considered vulnerable tenants?
Vulnerable tenants include people on Universal Credit, individuals with poor credit, single parents, people with disabilities, care leavers, recent migrants, and those with little or no rental history.
Isn’t it illegal to discriminate against tenants on benefits under the new Bill?
Yes, blanket bans against those on benefits or with children are prohibited, but indirect or ‘soft’ discrimination—such as applying stricter affordability checks—can still achieve the same exclusionary effect.
What can vulnerable tenants do if they suspect discrimination?
Tenants can file complaints with the local authority or challenge discrimination through the courts, though this process can be intimidating, expensive, and lengthy.
How can the government help prevent lockout from the PRS?
Policymakers can offer landlord incentives, create rent insurance programs, introduce public guarantor schemes, and increase the supply of social housing to support inclusion.
Will the Bill increase homelessness?
If vulnerable tenants are excluded from the PRS without suitable alternative housing, homelessness rates could rise, placing added pressure on local authorities and support services.
Are landlords justified in becoming more cautious?
Many landlords argue that the removal of Section 21, increased regulation, and longer eviction processes pose financial risks, prompting them to be more selective in their tenant approval.
What role do letting agents play in tenant selection?
Letting agents often act on behalf of landlords and implement stringent vetting criteria. These can include income multiples, credit checks, and references, all of which may screen out vulnerable applicants.
Is the Bill currently in effect?
The Renters’ Rights Bill is still being passed through the legislative process and is subject to amendments. Its core principles, however, have received strong cross-party support and are expected to become law in some form by 2025.
The British Landlords Association is a national landlords’ association for UK landlords. It is one of the largest landlord associations in the UK. Join us now for £79.95!
Our top-read blogs
Tenant Referencing & Credit Checks Special offer 33% off Now
