Direct discrimination generally occurs when a person is treated less favourably because of a protected characteristic.
It may involve:
Government guidance describes direct discrimination as treating someone worse because they have, are perceived to have, or are associated with a protected characteristic. Subject to limited statutory exceptions, direct discrimination cannot ordinarily be justified simply because the agent or client considers it convenient.
Discrimination by perception can occur where someone is treated less favourably because they are believed to have a protected characteristic, even if that belief is incorrect.
An applicant is refused a viewing because an employee assumes from the applicant’s name that they belong to a particular religion.
The assumption may be incorrect, but the treatment can still be discriminatory.
Discrimination by association may occur where a person is treated less favourably because of their connection with someone who has a protected characteristic.
A buyer is discouraged from viewing a property because the employee learns that the buyer’s child is disabled and assumes the transaction will be complicated.
Potential direct discrimination may include:
All relevant prospective adult occupiers should be checked consistently in accordance with the applicable Right to Rent procedure.
Employees must not:
Official guidance states that prospective tenants should not be treated differently because of the type of lawful Right to Rent check required.
A landlord or seller may express a discriminatory preference. MyEstate must not implement an unlawful instruction merely because it came from the client.
An employee should:
A client’s preference does not authorise MyEstate or its employees to discriminate.